| Case
Study
Pike Pig Systems
113
E. Washington Street
Pittsfield, IL 62363
(217) 285-4636
February
2, 2010
In the fall of 2008 we started working with a 4-5 year old 6400-sow
farm that had a history of at least two previous PRRS virus
outbreaks. Each break followed up with treatment with PRRS serum
therapy of both the sow herd and attached GDU. The farm was
in the process of trying to eradicate the virus through redesigned
animal and personnel flows as well as stricter bio-security
procedures. However, after a period of time with poor quality
pigs, short pig placements, disgruntled owners, disgruntled
workers, and higher costs, the frustration level was at an all
time high. At this time ownership changed their focus from PRRS
eradication to improved numbers of good quality pigs regardless
of the PRRS status of the pigs or the sow herd. Scrapping the
PRRS eradication program led us to explore other PRRS management
strategies.
The
farm structure is a 6400 sow breed-wean farm with 2 gestation
barns and common farrowing rooms. There are 2 isolation nurseries
capable of handling 360 gilts which are delivered (PRRS naïve)
to the farm every four weeks at 3-4 weeks of age. After an 8
week stay, the gilts are moved into the gilt grow finish facility
that is attached to the sow farm. Once gilts reach 28 weeks
of age and have received proper vaccination and acclimation,
they are then moved into the breeding/gestation barns. Once
the PRRS eradication procedures had been eliminated, the daily
foot traffic and chores returned to a more normal farm routine.
We also began using a new sub-unit PRRS vaccine as a 2-dose
vaccination prior to replacement gilts being introduced into
the breeding herd. The new PRRS sub-unit vaccine was the same
product that had been given to all sows in weeks 44 and 48 of
2008. Prior to the use of the PRRS sub-unit vaccine, the herd
performance was at a 10.85% live born, 4.7% still born rate,
1.9% mummy rate, 17% pre-weaning mortality and 8.7 pigs per
sow weaning average.
With
these changes we had targeted producing 2700 pigs per week rather
than the 1900 to 2100 pigs per week we had produced over the
previous nine months. Approximately 12 weeks after beginning
the new vaccination program (week 4 of 2009), we started seeing
an increase in the pre-weaning mortality, stillborn and mummy
rate, and experienced 37 late term abortions. Keeping in mind
that all these animals had already received two doses of the
new sub-unit PRRS vaccine, we pulled blood out of symptomatic
sows in gestation, pigs in farrowing and gilts getting ready
to leave the isolation nursery (delivered naïve and sero-converted
naturally) after their 8-week stay. We found all three sampled
areas yielded 100 percent PRRS PCR positive results. Immediate
virus sequencing was done. Samples from all 3 areas of the farm
yielded the same PRRS virus. The decision then was made to come
back and booster the entire population with another dose of
the same, new sub-unit PRRS vaccine on week 8 of 2009.
During
that time, we had planned on investigating other possibilities
in regard to PRRS management control. We also started testing
pigs coming out of the farrowing house 4 weeks after the sow
booster of the new sub-unit PRRS vaccine was given. We found
pigs to be PRRS positive coming out of farrowing every week
that we tested between weeks 13 and 17, 2009. Considering that
it had been 6 weeks since the booster of the new sub-unit vaccine
had been given, we concluded that it was time to look at our
next option. During our testing we had heard about MJ Biologics,
and submitted the 3 strains of PRRS virus sequences for evaluation
and characterization of viruses based on MJPRRS™ grouping
technology to make sure that the virus groups of those isolated
would be included in the vaccine that we used. Once we got the
vaccine, we used it on the entire sow herd and all the way through
isolation (10,000 doses+/-).
When
the MJPRRS™ vaccine was put into the herd we were operating
at a 5.5% stillborn rate and 18% mummy rate over the previous
10 weeks. The new sub-unit vaccine that we had used appeared
to stop late stage abortions, but did not seem to have an effect
on stillborn or mummy rates. The vaccine also appeared to have
no affect on limiting PCR status for PRRS virus in pigs at weaning
time. The booster (2nd vaccination) of the MJPRRS™ was
given to all sows in the herd on weeks 22 of 2009. Once again
all groups being weaned had samples taken from the poorest pigs
in the group to do PCR analysis for PRRS virus beginning with
week 18 and continuing through week 25.
The summary
of information based on records and laboratory analysis appears
to be very significant. By the 4th week after the first dose
of MJPRRS™
vaccine, mummy rates had dropped from 19% down to 6.3% and continued
to inch its way down to the present level of 1.6%. The stillborn
rate also decreased from 5.5% down to 4.5%. Pigs remained PCR
positive for PRRS until the 6th week (week 24 of 2009) after
the initial vaccination or 2 weeks after the booster. The farm
has continued the vaccination program by giving a whole herd
booster of the MJPRRS™ vaccine every 13 weeks. Pigs coming
out of the farrowing house remain PCR negative for PRRS from
week 24 of 2009 to the present time.
At this
point, the MJPRRS™ approach has resulted in a significant
increase in pigs produced each week (2750-2850) as well as a
major improvement in pig quality. Owners claimed that a year
earlier the pigs they received averaged 70% good, 20% questionable
but start-able and 10% of no value. The same owners today rate
them 95% excellent pigs, 3% good pigs and 2% off pigs. Performance
of the pigs in nurseries and finishers has been exceptional.
Due to these results on this farm as well as others where MJPRRS™
was used, we plan to continue to use this product as our first
option.
Patrick L. Graham M.S., D.V.M.
John McIntire, General Manager
David Bishop, PhD
|